Women in Secret Societies: A Historical and Modern View

Fraternal orders spent roughly three centuries building elaborate rituals, initiatory degrees, and constitutions — and writing women out of nearly all of them. That exclusion was rarely incidental. It was structural, argued with theological justification, and sometimes codified in founding documents. The story of women in secret societies is partly about that wall, and partly about what happened when women decided to build their own, or simply knock it down.

Definition and scope

"Women in secret societies" covers three distinct categories that are often conflated: female-exclusive fraternal organizations, co-ed or mixed-gender esoteric societies, and the gradual admission of women into historically male orders. Each category has a different origin, a different institutional logic, and a different relationship to the ritual traditions inherited from the 18th and 19th centuries.

The broadest frame includes bodies affiliated with Freemasonry — the Order of the Eastern Star, established in its modern form by Rob Morris in 1850, being the largest. Eastern Star requires a Masonic family connection for female members and operates under a parallel but subordinate relationship to the male Grand Lodges. Membership peaked at roughly 3 million in the mid-20th century, according to the Order of the Eastern Star's own historical accounts, before declining alongside most fraternal bodies. Women seeking a fuller picture of the history of secret societies will find that female participation was frequently adjacent, derivative, or hidden rather than central — until it wasn't.

How it works

The mechanics of female participation depend entirely on which type of organization is involved. A structured breakdown clarifies the main models:

  1. Appendant bodies — organizations like Eastern Star or the Order of the Amaranth, which exist in formal relationship to male Masonic lodges. Membership often requires a male Masonic sponsor. Ritual content mirrors Masonic structure but is distinct from the Craft degrees.

  2. Co-Masonic or mixed-gender lodges — bodies such as Le Droit Humain, founded in France in 1893, which initiated women on equal terms with men from its founding. Co-Masonic lodges use the same three-degree Blue Lodge structure recognized in regular Freemasonry but are not recognized by the United Grand Lodge of England or most mainstream Grand Lodges.

  3. Independent female orders — organizations with no formal Masonic dependency, such as the Daughters of the Nile (tied to the Shriners) or the Rebekah lodges, the female branch of the Odd Fellows, chartered as early as 1851.

  4. Esoteric and occult societies — many of the 19th- and early-20th-century esoteric bodies, including the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (founded 1887), admitted women as full initiates from the start. The Golden Dawn's founding members included Mina Bergson, later known as Moina Mathers, who held significant intellectual and ritual authority within the order.

The contrast between category 1 and category 4 is instructive. Masonic-adjacent bodies admitted women instrumentally — maintaining male authority at the apex. Esoteric orders often admitted women because their philosophical premises, drawn from Hermeticism and Neoplatonism, treated gendered spiritual hierarchy as irrelevant or actively counterproductive.

Common scenarios

The most common scenario historically was a woman joining an appendant body because a husband, father, or son was a Master Mason. Eastern Star chapters were often the social backbone of lodge communities — handling charitable fundraising, organizing meals, maintaining the interpersonal fabric that kept lodges functioning. The labor was considerable; the governance authority was limited.

A less common but better-documented scenario is the founding of independent orders. The evolution of fraternal orders in the US during the late 19th century produced dozens of female mutual aid societies, some connected to ethnic or religious communities, that operated with full female leadership and handled genuine financial instruments — death benefits, sick pay, community loans. These were not decorative organizations.

The modern scenario increasingly involves direct admission. Several mainstream Masonic jurisdictions in France and Belgium have moved toward admitting women into previously male lodges, though the United Grand Lodge of England, which governs regular Freemasonry in England and Wales, maintained in its 2017 guidance that Freemasonry remains limited to men as a matter of its original constitutional character. The key dimensions and scopes of secret society page addresses how these jurisdictional distinctions work in practice.

Decision boundaries

The central tension in any discussion of women and secret societies is between two competing claims: that single-sex fraternal space has distinct social and psychological value, and that formal exclusion of women from ritual and governance structures perpetuates hierarchies that belong to another era.

Regular Freemasonry draws a clear line: the male-only requirement is treated as constitutive, not incidental. Co-Masonic and feminist Masonic bodies draw a different line: they argue that the principles of Freemasonry — brotherhood, moral improvement, the search for light — are logically incompatible with excluding half the human population. Both positions have been argued seriously, at length, by people with deep knowledge of Masonic history.

For college secret societies, the calculus shifted decisively in the late 20th century. Skull and Bones at Yale, examined more closely on the Skull and Bones Society page, admitted women beginning in 1991 after a contested vote — a change that older members described at the time, with some drama, as the end of the society as they knew it. The society continued.

The decision boundary for any individual organization typically hinges on three factors: whether its founding documents treat male-only membership as definitional or circumstantial; whether its governing body has democratic amendment procedures; and whether external legal or institutional pressure (such as university recognition requirements) creates incentive to change. The full landscape of fraternal life — including where women fit within it — is indexed at secretsocietyauthority.com.

References

Read Next

History of Secret Societies in America This page traces that arc: the structural forms these organizations have taken, the social forces that drove their growth and... The Independent Order of Odd Fellows in America This page covers the organization's structure, how lodges operate, the circumstances that typically draw people to membership,... Evolution of Fraternal Orders in the United States This page traces their development from the colonial tavern to the contemporary lodge hall — examining how these organizations...